Closepact, side by side.
Honest comparisons. We name where the competitor wins. No fake checkmarks, no fake pricing.
The tools we are compared with
- Scheduling & work orders
Closepact vs Bokning och Schema
The established Swedish scheduling tool
Bokning och Schema has route optimisation, online booking, PAXML payroll export and a finished Fortnox sync today; Closepact has none of those yet. Closepact has the lower base price at every tier, keeps invoicing in the same database instead of syncing it to another system, and does not promise automatic clock-in from a web app.
Read the comparison → - Invoicing & accounting
Closepact vs Fortnox
Sweden's default accounting platform
Fortnox keeps the books and Closepact does not; Closepact replaces the invoicing program, builds the invoice from approved work and hands Fortnox SIE4 for the period. Fortnox licenses each program per user, so which one costs less depends on how many people invoice.
Read the comparison → - Scheduling & invoicing for cleaning
Closepact vs TimeWave
Business system for cleaning and home service
TimeWave is built for cleaning and home-service companies and has a customer portal, a booking assistant, e-invoices to the internet bank and payroll export, none of which Closepact has. Closepact has published prices that do not follow your turnover, no start fee, quotes with e-signing, and the RUT and ROT request file for Skatteverket.
Read the comparison → - Business system for cleaning
Closepact vs Tengella
The cleaning-company ERP
Tengella is the broader system: online booking, a customer portal, BankID e-signing, e-invoices over Peppol, Kivra and a collection service, with unlimited users. Closepact is the smaller and cheaper one for a company of up to about 20 people, sold in modules at fixed prices, and builds the RUT request file for Skatteverket from paid invoices.
Read the comparison →
Want to see Closepact with your own jobs?
Twenty minutes. We set up one of your own jobs before the call.
Book a demo