Bokning och Schema has route optimisation, online booking, PAXML payroll export and a finished Fortnox sync today; Closepact has none of those yet. Closepact has the lower base price at every tier, keeps invoicing in the same database instead of syncing it to another system, and does not promise automatic clock-in from a web app.
We are not neutral. We try to be honest about where Bokning och Schema wins.
The short answer
Bokning & Schema Online (BOS) is a scheduling, work-order and time-reporting system from Bird Vision AB, started on a Stockholm cleaning company in 2015 and sold to cleaning, installation, property-care and security firms. It is the tool Closepact's Schema & arbetsorder module is most often weighed against, and on several points it is ahead: route optimisation on Google Maps driving times, an online booking widget, PAXML payroll export, open shifts staff claim from the app, and a two-way sync with Fortnox, Visma and Hogia.
Closepact's case is narrower and concrete. The base price is lower at every tier. The schedule reports conflicts without refusing the booking and does not mistake a lunch break for a gap. Clock-ins and clock-outs in the field app queue offline and count from the moment of the tap. And with the invoicing module, approved hours become an invoice draft in the same database, with ROT and RUT split by line type and SIE4 for the accountant — no sync to keep in step.
If your week depends on optimised routes or on customers booking themselves, BOS does that today and Closepact does not. If it depends on the hours becoming a correct invoice, read on.
Who it is for
Who Bokning och Schema and Closepact are built for
Bokning och Schema
Built for Swedish service companies with a recurring week of visits: cleaning, property care, installation and service, security. It suits a firm that already invoices in Fortnox, Visma or Hogia and wants the schedule to feed that system, wants customers to book online, and runs enough vans that drive time matters. The staff app is native on iOS and Android, and quotes with BankID signing are included from the Standard tier.
Closepact
Built for Swedish service and field companies of five to a hundred employees that want the quote, the schedule and the invoice in one database, bought as separate modules. It suits a firm whose problem is the handover from schedule to invoice rather than the drive between jobs, whose crews work where coverage drops, and whose accountant wants SIE4 rather than PDFs. Route optimisation and online booking are not built.
Where Bokning och Schema wins
Route optimisation on actual Google Maps driving times, with customer time windows, skills and re-planning during the day.
eBoka, an online booking widget that puts the booking straight onto the schedule (listed on Standard and Pro).
A two-way sync with Fortnox, Visma and Hogia for customers, articles and invoice drafts, from the Standard tier.
PAXML and Excel payroll export, automatic OB supplements, open shifts and staff chat on Standard and Pro.
Recurring jobs on every tier, Basic included, and quotes with BankID signing from Standard.
Where Closepact wins
A lower base price at every tier: 449, 619 and 799 kr against their 499, 699 and 899 kr billed quarterly.
Invoicing is a module in the same database, so approved hours become an invoice draft with no sync between them.
Conflict checks report and never refuse a booking, and a break of up to 60 minutes is merged rather than flagged.
Clock-ins and clock-outs queue offline and count from the tap, by the phone's clock, so an hour in a basement is recorded when it happened.
Time approval on every tier, and a person who is only planned, never signed in, is a resource rather than a paid seat.
What decides it
The differences that matter when you choose
01 Conflicts: reported, or prevented
Both systems check a booking before it is saved. BOS's scheduling page says double bookings, overtime and rest-period breaches are flagged before saving. Whether that warns or blocks is not stated, so we will not characterise it.
Closepact runs four checks at two severities. A double booking and a job outside someone's employment dates are errors; absence and working hours are warnings. None of them refuses the booking, because the planner often knows what the system does not — that the customer moved the time, or that two addresses share a stairwell. A break of 60 minutes or less is merged before working hours are judged, so a lunch does not turn every midday job into a warning. Drive time is ignored; the gap between two addresses is the planner's call.
02 The field app: native and geofenced, or a web app that clocks offline and is honest about position
BOS ships a native staff app for iOS and Android with BankID login, and its time-tracking page says geofenced workplaces clock staff in on arrival and out on departure. A native app can do that. Its pages do not say whether the app works without coverage.
Closepact's field app is a progressive web app, not an App Store app. A web app on iOS gets no position in the background, so there is no automatic clock-in. On Väx and Pro the position is taken when the button is pressed and the server compares it with the job address; a missing reading is stored as unknown, not as outside. What works in the basement is the clock: clock-ins and clock-outs queue on the phone, drain in order when the signal returns and count from the moment of the tap, and the timesheet flags any that synced more than 15 minutes late. The checklist, photos, materials and the customer's signature are sent at completion and need a connection; they do not queue offline.
03 Route optimisation, online booking and payroll: their lead
BOS plans each team's day on Google Maps driving times with time windows and skills, and re-plans when a job is added or cancelled. Its eBoka widget lets customers book from your website against real availability, with confirmation by SMS and email. Neither exists in Closepact; both are on the Pro roadmap, marked planned, and neither is in the price today.
BOS also exports payroll as PAXML — Closepact has no payroll export at all; approved time leaves only as an invoice basis — handles OB supplements, and lets staff claim open shifts and chat in the app. If routing decides your margin — many vans, many stops, tight windows — BOS is the better tool today, and you should not wait for us.
04 Invoicing: a sync to another system, or the same database
BOS turns a completed job into an invoice draft with hours, materials, travel and the ROT/RUT split, and publishes it to Fortnox, Visma or Hogia through a two-way sync, or sends it from BOS. That beats Closepact's scheduling module on its own: our Fortnox, Visma and Hogia connections are planned, not built, so the basis leaves as a CSV or SIE4 file.
With Closepact's invoicing module added, nothing leaves. Approved hours, materials and the job's ROT/RUT flag become a draft invoice in the same database. The number comes from an unbroken series when the invoice is sent, Skatteverket's share sits on its own receivable account, and the accountant gets a balance-checked SIE4 file for the period. There is one customer register, so there is no mapping to maintain.
05 Price per tier, and which tier you actually need
BOS shows quarterly billing by default: Basic 499, Standard 699 and Pro 899 kr a month with five users, then 49, 69 and 89 kr per extra user. Billed monthly it is 599, 799 and 999 kr, then 59, 79 and 99. Closepact lists 449, 619 and 799 kr, then 45, 59 and 79, on an annual agreement; quarterly adds 10 per cent. Quarterly against quarterly our base stays lower at every tier, but our Start extra user becomes 49.50 kr against their 49 — the one figure where Closepact is not lower.
The tiers do not match feature for feature. Their Basic has recurring jobs, which start at our Väx; our Start has time approval and work-order checklists, which their Basic lacks. GPS clock-in is on their Standard and our Väx. Compare the tier you need, not the tier in the same position.
Capability comparison
Closepact vs Bokning och Schema, feature by feature
Capability
Closepact
Bokning och Schema
Conflict check
Four checks, two severities, never blocks
Double booking, overtime, rest periods flagged
Recurring jobs
Väx and Pro
All tiers
GPS-verified clock-in
At the tap, checked on the server (Väx, Pro)
GPS-stamped (Standard, Pro)
Automatic geofenced clock-in
Not offered — an iOS web app cannot
Advertised in the native app
Field app
Web app; clock-in and clock-out queue offline
Native iOS and Android; offline not stated
Time approval
All tiers
Standard and Pro
Route optimisation
Planned
Online booking widget
Planned
eBoka (Standard, Pro)
Fortnox, Visma, Hogia connection
Planned; CSV or SIE4 today
Two-way sync (Standard, Pro)
Invoicing
A module in the same database
Drafts to Fortnox/Visma/Hogia, or sent from BOS
ROT/RUT split
Flag on the job, split on the invoice line
Split on the invoice draft
Payroll export
Not built
PAXML and Excel (Standard, Pro)
Quotes with e-signing
Separate module, from 199 kr per user
Included on Standard and Pro
Price, entry tier
449 kr + 45 kr per extra user (annual)
499 kr + 49 kr quarterly; 599 kr + 59 kr monthly
SMS, per message
0.89 kr
1.50 / 1.20 / 1.00 kr by tier
BankID signature
Built, being activated (quotes Väx, Pro), 4.49 kr
8.99 / 6.99 / 4.99 kr by tier
Competitor facts checked against Bokning och Schema's own public pages on 2026-10-18. We update this page when either product ships a meaningful change.
Pricing snapshot
Pricing, honestly summarized
Bokning och Schema
Bokning och Schema: Basic 499, Standard 699, Pro 899 kr a month billed quarterly (599, 799, 999 kr billed monthly), five users included, then 49/69/89 kr per extra user quarterly or 59/79/99 kr monthly. SMS 1.50/1.20/1.00 kr and BankID 8.99/6.99/4.99 kr by tier; API listed at 199 kr a month.
Closepact
Closepact Schema & arbetsorder: Start 449, Väx 619, Pro 799 kr a month on an annual agreement, five users included, then 45/59/79 kr per extra user. Quarterly billing adds 10 per cent. 15 per cent off the whole bill with a second module, 25 with a third.
Both offer a 14-day free trial without a card. Closepact's is per module.
Worked example
A cleaning company with 12 staff
Twelve people sign in through the app, and the company needs recurring jobs and GPS clock-in: Closepact Väx against BOS Standard. Closepact: 619 + 7 × 59 = 1 032 kr a month, 12 384 kr a year on an annual agreement (1 135.20 kr a month billed quarterly). BOS Standard billed quarterly: 699 + 7 × 69 = 1 182 kr a month, 14 184 kr a year; billed monthly, 799 + 7 × 79 = 1 352 kr, 16 224 kr a year. Against their quarterly price Closepact is 150 kr a month, 1 800 kr a year lower; quarterly against quarterly, 46.80 kr a month.
If recurring jobs are all they need — no GPS, no time approval, no accounting link — BOS Basic costs 499 + 7 × 49 = 842 kr a month, less than our Väx. Our Start (449 + 7 × 45 = 764 kr) has no recurring jobs. In that case BOS is cheaper.
Now add quotes and invoicing. BOS Standard includes quotes; its invoices go to Fortnox, where recurring invoices need Fakturering Plus at 149 kr per user: 1 182 + 149 = 1 331 kr a month, 15 972 kr a year. Closepact with one Offert Start seat (199 kr: templates and e-signing; the price table needs Väx) and Fakturering Väx (279 kr, with RUT and recurring invoices): (1 032 + 199 + 279) × 0.75 = 1 132.50 kr a month, 13 590 kr a year. Fortnox bookkeeping and per-use SMS and BankID charges are left out of both.
Drive time between stops is a large share of your week, and you want routes optimised rather than planned by hand.
Customers should book themselves from your website now, not at some later date.
You invoice in Fortnox, Visma or Hogia, intend to keep doing so, and want the schedule synced to it today.
Payroll needs a PAXML file, or staff should claim open shifts from their phones.
Your crews need an App Store or Google Play app that clocks them in on arrival.
Recurring jobs are needed on the cheapest tier.
Choose Closepact if
You want approved hours to become an invoice in the same system, with ROT and RUT split by line type and SIE4 for the accountant.
Crews work in basements and stairwells where coverage drops, and the clock must show when the work happened.
Your planners sometimes double-book on purpose and want to be told, not stopped.
You plan routes by hand anyway, so an optimiser would not change your week.
You may add quotes or invoicing later and want 15 or 25 per cent off the whole bill when you do.
Switching
Moving from Bokning och Schema
Export your customer list from BOS as CSV; contacts import into Closepact from CSV. Articles import from CSV too if you take the invoicing module, with semicolons or commas and multi-line descriptions kept whole. Service addresses, services, staff, skills and working hours are set up in Closepact; only those who sign in become paid seats.
The schedule history does not move. Open jobs and the coming weeks are re-created in Closepact; recurring jobs (from Väx) use a subset of RRULE, and a rule outside it is refused when you save rather than expanded wrongly months later. BOS is cancelled to the end of a contract period, so time the cut-over to one and keep BOS readable until the last job done there is invoiced.
If you invoice in Fortnox through BOS's sync and are not taking Closepact's invoicing module, the basis will reach Fortnox as a CSV or SIE4 file until our Fortnox connection ships. If you are, set its invoice series to continue from your last Fortnox number before the first invoice goes out, and keep Fortnox for the books.
Comparison FAQ
What buyers ask when they compare Closepact and Bokning och Schema
Is Closepact an alternative to Bokning och Schema?
For the schedule, work orders, time approval and the field app, yes, at a lower base price on every tier. Not yet for route optimisation, online booking, PAXML payroll export or a finished Fortnox, Visma or Hogia sync: those are BOS features today and Closepact roadmap. The case for switching is strongest where the invoice is the problem, because with the invoicing module the approved hours become an invoice in the same database.
Does Closepact clock staff in automatically when they arrive?
No. Closepact's field app is a web app, and a web app on iOS gets no position in the background, so automatic clock-in cannot be built there. BOS advertises geofenced clock-in in its native iOS and Android app, which is a different kind of app. Closepact takes the position the moment the button is pressed and the server checks it against the job address. A missing reading is stored as unknown, never as outside the fence.
Does the Closepact app work without coverage?
Partly. It opens with no network, and clock-ins and clock-outs queue on the phone. The queue drains in the order things happened and stops at the first real failure rather than skipping past it, because a clock-out depends on the clock-in before it. A queued clock-in counts from the moment of the tap by the phone's clock — within limits: no more than five minutes ahead or a week back — and the timesheet flags stretches synced more than 15 minutes late. The checklist, materials, photos and the customer's signature are sent online at completion; they do not queue offline.
We already send invoices to Fortnox from BOS. What changes?
With Closepact's scheduling module alone, the invoice basis leaves as a CSV or SIE4 file, because our Fortnox, Visma and Hogia connections are planned, not built. That is a step back from BOS's two-way sync, and you should weigh it. With the invoicing module as well, the export disappears: the invoice is built from approved hours in the same database, and Fortnox receives SIE4 for the period.
What do we lose by switching today?
Route optimisation, online booking, PAXML payroll export, the finished accounting sync, open shifts, in-app chat and a native app. Route optimisation and online booking are marked planned on our Pro tier; a payroll export is not on the list at all. None of them is ticked or charged for today. If your week depends on optimised driving routes, that is a reason to stay or to wait.
Is it actually cheaper?
On base price, at every tier and on either billing period. Closepact's annual price against BOS's quarterly price: 449/619/799 kr against 499/699/899 kr, and 45/59/79 kr per extra user against 49/69/89 kr. Billed quarterly on both sides, our Start extra user is 49.50 kr against their 49 kr, the one figure where we are not lower. SMS is 0.89 kr against 1.00–1.50 kr. Recurring jobs sit on their Basic but our Väx.
Do quotes cost extra in Closepact?
Yes. BOS includes quotes on Standard and Pro and charges per BankID signature. In Closepact quotes are a separate module, Offert & e-signering, from 199 kr per user a month, and taking it alongside scheduling takes 15 per cent off both. Signing is a traceable e-signature with no per-signature fee; BankID signing, on the quote module's Väx and Pro tiers, is built but not yet switched on and will cost 4.49 kr per signature.
Does every field worker need a paid seat?
In Closepact, only the people who sign in. A person can sit in the schedule as a resource, with skills and working hours, without an account; somebody using the field app has an account and counts as a seat. Five seats are included on every tier of the scheduling module, then 45, 59 or 79 kr per extra user depending on the tier.
Sources
What this page says about Bokning och Schema comes from Bokning och Schema's own public pages, listed below, as they read on 2026-10-18. Dollar prices are converted at 9,59 kr per USD, the rate checked on 2026-09-15. If something here is out of date, write to hello@closepact.com and we correct it.
Twenty minutes, no slides. Tell us which module you are looking at, and we set it up with one of your own quotes, a week of your schedule or an invoice before the call.